yao/agent/robot/TODO.md
Max add933d34c Refactor Job System Integration to Execution Storage
- Removed the job system integration from the robot execution flow, transitioning to a dedicated ExecutionStore for managing execution records.
- Updated the design documentation to reflect the new architecture, emphasizing the relationship between robots and concurrent executions.
- Revised the API to return execution IDs instead of job IDs, ensuring clarity in execution tracking.
- Enhanced logging mechanisms to utilize the kun/log package for better traceability of execution phases.
- Updated tests and documentation to align with the removal of job-related structures and the introduction of execution management.
2026-01-22 18:24:50 +08:00

1358 lines
57 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Robot Agent - Implementation TODO
> Based on DESIGN.md and TECHNICAL.md
> Test environment: `source yao/env.local.sh`
> Test assistants: `yao-dev-app/assistants/robot/`
---
## Workflow: Human-AI Collaboration
**Important:** Follow this workflow strictly for each sub-task.
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Implementation Workflow │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. AI: Implement code for current sub-task │
│ 2. AI: Present code for review (DO NOT write tests yet) │
│ 3. Human: Review code, provide feedback │
│ 4. AI: Iterate based on feedback │
│ 5. Human: Confirm "LGTM" or "Approved" │
│ 6. AI: Write tests for the approved code │
│ 7. Human: Review tests │
│ 8. AI: Run tests, fix if needed │
│ 9. Human: Confirm sub-task complete, move to next │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**Rules:**
| Rule | Description |
| ------------------------ | ------------------------------------------ |
| One sub-task at a time | Focus only on current sub-task |
| No tests before approval | Wait for human "LGTM" before writing tests |
| No jumping ahead | Do not implement future phases |
| Ask if unclear | When in doubt, ask before proceeding |
---
## Core Principle
- Phase 1-2: Types + Skeleton (code compiles)
- Phase 3: Complete scheduling system (Cache + Pool + Trigger + Dedup + Job), executor is stub
- Phase 4-9: Implement executor phases one by one (P0 → P5)
- Phase 10: API completion, end-to-end tests
- Monitoring: Provided by Job system, no separate implementation
---
## Phase 1: Types & Interfaces ✅
**Goal:** Define all types, enums, interfaces. No logic, no external deps.
**Status:** Complete - 88.4% test coverage, all tests passing
### 1.1 Enums (`types/enums.go`)
- [x] `Phase` - execution phases (inspiration, goals, tasks, run, delivery, learning)
- [x] `ClockMode` - clock trigger modes (times, interval, daemon)
- [x] `TriggerType` - trigger sources (clock, human, event)
- [x] `ExecStatus` - execution status (pending, running, completed, failed, cancelled)
- [x] `RobotStatus` - robot status (idle, working, paused, error, maintenance)
- [x] `InterventionAction` - human actions (task.add, goal.adjust, etc.)
- [x] `Priority` - priority levels (high, normal, low)
- [x] `DeliveryType` - delivery types (email, webhook, process, notify)
- [x] `DedupResult` - dedup results (skip, merge, proceed)
- [x] `EventSource` - event sources (webhook, database)
- [x] `LearningType` - learning types (execution, feedback, insight)
- [x] `TaskSource` - task sources (auto, human, event)
- [x] `ExecutorType` - executor types (assistant, mcp, process)
- [x] `TaskStatus` - task status (pending, running, completed, failed, skipped, cancelled)
- [x] `InsertPosition` - insert positions (first, last, next, at)
### 1.2 Context (`types/context.go`)
- [x] `Context` struct - robot execution context
- [x] `NewContext()` - constructor
- [x] `UserID()`, `TeamID()` - helper methods
### 1.3 Config Types (`types/config.go`)
- [x] `Config` - main config struct
- [x] `Triggers`, `TriggerSwitch` - trigger enable/disable
- [x] `Clock` - clock config with validation
- [x] `Identity` - role, duties, rules
- [x] `Quota` - concurrency limits with defaults
- [x] `KB`, `DB` - knowledge base and database config
- [x] `Learn` - learning config
- [x] `Resources`, `MCPConfig` - available agents and tools
- [x] `Delivery` - output delivery config
- [x] `Event` - event trigger config
### 1.4 Core Types (`types/robot.go`)
- [x] `Robot` struct - runtime robot representation
- [x] `Robot` methods - `CanRun()`, `RunningCount()`, `AddExecution()`, `RemoveExecution()`, `GetExecution()`, `GetExecutions()`
- [x] `Execution` struct - single execution instance
- [x] `TriggerInput` - stored trigger input
- [x] `CurrentState` - current executing state
- [x] `Goals` - P1 output (markdown)
- [x] `Task` - planned task (structured)
- [x] `TaskResult` - task execution result
- [x] `DeliveryResult` - delivery output
- [x] `LearningEntry` - knowledge to save
### 1.5 Clock Context (`types/clock.go`)
- [x] `ClockContext` struct - time context for P0
- [x] `NewClockContext()` - constructor
### 1.6 Inspiration (`types/inspiration.go`)
- [x] `InspirationReport` struct - P0 output
### 1.7 Request/Response (`types/request.go`)
- [x] `InterveneRequest` - human intervention request
- [x] `EventRequest` - event trigger request
- [x] `ExecutionResult` - trigger result
- [x] `RobotState` - robot status query result
### 1.8 Interfaces (`types/interfaces.go`)
- [x] `Manager` interface
- [x] `Executor` interface
- [x] `Pool` interface
- [x] `Cache` interface
- [x] `Dedup` interface
- [x] `Store` interface
### 1.9 Errors (`types/errors.go`)
- [x] Config errors
- [x] Runtime errors
- [x] Phase errors
### 1.10 Tests
- [x] `types/enums_test.go` - enum validation
- [x] `types/config_test.go` - config validation
- [x] `types/clock_test.go` - clock context creation
- [x] `types/robot_test.go` - robot methods
---
## Phase 2: Skeleton Implementation ✅
**Goal:** Create all packages with empty/stub implementations. Code compiles.
**Status:** Complete - All packages compile successfully, no circular dependencies
### 2.1 Utils (`utils/`) ✅
- [x] `utils/convert.go` - JSON, map, struct conversions (implement)
- [x] `utils/time.go` - time parsing, formatting, timezone (implement)
- [x] `utils/id.go` - ID generation (nanoid) (implement)
- [x] `utils/validate.go` - validation helpers (implement)
- [x] Test: `utils/utils_test.go`
### 2.2 Package Skeletons ✅ (stubs only, implemented in Phase 3)
Create empty structs and stub methods that return nil/empty/success:
- [x] `cache/cache.go` - Cache struct, stub methods
- [x] `dedup/dedup.go` - Dedup struct, stub methods
- [x] `store/store.go` - Store struct, stub methods
- [x] `pool/pool.go` - Pool struct, stub methods
- [x] `plan/plan.go` - Plan struct, stub methods
- [x] `trigger/trigger.go` - trigger dispatcher stub
- [x] `executor/executor.go` - Executor struct, stub `Execute()`
- [x] `manager/manager.go` - Manager struct, stub methods
### 2.3 API Skeletons ✅
- [x] `api/api.go` - Go API facade (all function signatures, return errors)
- [x] `api/process.go` - Yao Process registration (all processes, return errors)
- [x] `api/jsapi.go` - JSAPI registration (all methods, return errors)
### 2.4 Root ✅
- [x] `robot.go` - package entry
- [x] `Init()` - placeholder
- [x] `Shutdown()` - placeholder
### 2.5 Compile Test ✅
- [x] All packages compile without errors
- [x] All imports resolve correctly
- [x] No circular dependencies
---
## Phase 3: Complete Scheduling System ✅
**Goal:** Implement complete scheduling system. Executor is stub (simulates success).
**Status:** Complete - All 7 sub-tasks done, 80+ integration tests passing
This phase delivers a fully working scheduling pipeline:
```
Trigger → Manager → Cache → Dedup → Pool → Worker → Executor(stub) → Job
```
### ✅ 3.1 Cache Implementation (COMPLETE)
- [x] `cache/cache.go` - Cache struct with thread-safe map
- [x] `cache/load.go` - load robots from `__yao.member` where `member_type='robot'` and `autonomous_mode=true`
- [x] Implemented pagination (100 robots per page)
- [x] Configurable model name via `SetMemberModel()`
- [x] `cache/refresh.go` - refresh single robot, periodic full refresh (every hour)
- [x] Test: load/refresh with real DB
- [x] Created comprehensive integration tests with real database
- [x] Tests cover Load, LoadByID, Refresh, ListByTeam, GetByStatus
- [x] All tests passing with proper cleanup
### ✅ 3.2 Pool Implementation (COMPLETE)
- [x] `pool/pool.go` - worker pool with configurable size (global limit)
- [x] Default config: 10 workers, 100 queue size
- [x] Configurable via `pool.NewWithConfig()`
- [x] `pool/queue.go` - priority queue (sorted by: robot priority, trigger type, wait time)
- [x] Two-level limit: global queue + per-robot queue
- [x] Priority: Robot Priority × 1000 + Trigger Priority × 100
- [x] `pool/worker.go` - worker goroutines, dispatch to executor
- [x] Non-blocking quota check with re-enqueue
- [x] Graceful shutdown support
- [x] Test: submit jobs, verify execution order, verify concurrency limits
- [x] 15 test cases covering all edge cases
- [x] All tests passing
### ✅ 3.3 Manager Implementation (COMPLETE)
> **Note:** Manager is the scheduling core, depends on completed Cache and Pool.
- [x] `manager/manager.go` - Manager struct
- [x] `Start()` - load cache, start pool, start ticker goroutine
- [x] `Stop()` - graceful shutdown (wait for running, drain queue)
- [x] `Tick()` - main loop:
1. Get all cached robots
2. For each robot with clock trigger enabled
3. Check if should execute (times/interval/daemon modes)
4. Submit to pool
- [x] `TriggerManual()` - manual trigger for testing/API
- [x] Clock modes: times, interval, daemon
- [x] Day matching for times mode
- [x] Timezone handling
- [x] Skip paused/error/maintenance robots
- [x] Test: manager start/stop, tick cycle, manual trigger, clock modes, goroutine leak
### ✅ 3.4 Trigger Implementation (COMPLETE)
- [x] `trigger/trigger.go` - validation and helper functions
- [x] `ValidateIntervention()` - validate human intervention requests
- [x] `ValidateEvent()` - validate event trigger requests
- [x] `BuildEventInput()` - build TriggerInput from event request
- [x] `GetActionCategory()` / `GetActionDescription()` - action helpers
- [x] `trigger/clock.go` - ClockMatcher for clock trigger matching
- [x] `times` mode: match specific times (09:00, 14:00)
- [x] `interval` mode: run every X duration (30m, 1h)
- [x] `daemon` mode: restart immediately after completion
- [x] Timezone handling
- [x] Day-of-week filtering
- [x] `trigger/control.go` - ExecutionController for pause/resume/stop
- [x] Track/Untrack executions
- [x] Pause/Resume execution
- [x] Stop execution (cancel context)
- [x] WaitIfPaused() for executor integration
- [x] `manager/manager.go` - integrated trigger handling
- [x] `Intervene()` - human intervention handler
- [x] `HandleEvent()` - event trigger handler
- [x] `PauseExecution()` / `ResumeExecution()` / `StopExecution()`
- [x] `ListExecutions()` / `ListExecutionsByMember()`
- [x] Tests: `trigger/trigger_test.go`, `trigger/clock_test.go`, `trigger/control_test.go`
- [x] Validation tests for intervention and event requests
- [x] Clock matching tests for all modes
- [x] ExecutionController lifecycle tests
- [x] Manager integration tests for Intervene/HandleEvent
### ✅ 3.5 Execution Storage (COMPLETE)
- [x] ExecutionStore - execution record persistence
- [x] Execution data stored in `__yao.agent_execution` table
- [x] All phase outputs (Inspiration, Goals, Tasks, Results, Delivery, Learning)
- [x] Status and phase tracking
- [x] Logging via `kun/log` package
- [x] Localization support (en-US, zh-CN)
- [x] Test: execution storage, status tracking
- [x] `store/execution_test.go` - execution store tests
- [x] All tests passing with real database
### ✅ 3.6 Executor Architecture (COMPLETE)
Pluggable executor architecture with multiple execution modes:
```
executor/
├── types/
│ ├── types.go # Executor interface, Config types
│ └── helpers.go # Shared helper functions
├── standard/
│ ├── executor.go # Real Agent execution (production)
│ ├── agent.go # AgentCaller for LLM calls
│ ├── input.go # InputFormatter for prompts
│ ├── inspiration.go # P0: Inspiration phase
│ ├── goals.go # P1: Goals phase
│ ├── tasks.go # P2: Tasks phase
│ ├── run.go # P3: Run phase
│ ├── delivery.go # P4: Delivery phase
│ └── learning.go # P5: Learning phase
├── dryrun/
│ └── executor.go # Simulated execution (testing/demo)
├── sandbox/
│ └── executor.go # Container-isolated (NOT IMPLEMENTED)
└── executor.go # Factory functions
```
**Execution Modes:**
| Mode | Use Case | Status |
| -------- | -------------------------------- | ------------------ |
| Standard | Production with real Agent calls | ✅ Implemented |
| DryRun | Tests, demos, scheduling tests | ✅ Implemented |
| Sandbox | Container-isolated execution | ⬜ Not Implemented |
> **⚠️ Sandbox Mode:** Requires container-level isolation (Docker/gVisor/Firecracker)
> for true security. Current placeholder behaves like DryRun. Future feature.
- [x] `executor/types/types.go` - `Executor` interface, `PhaseExecutor` interface
- [x] `executor/types/helpers.go` - `BuildTriggerInput()` shared helper
- [x] `executor/executor.go` - Factory functions (`New`, `NewDryRun`, `NewWithMode`)
- [x] `executor/standard/executor.go` - Real execution with Job integration
- [x] `executor/standard/phases.go` - Phase implementations (P0-P5)
- [x] `executor/dryrun/executor.go` - Simulated execution with callbacks
- [x] `executor/sandbox/executor.go` - Placeholder (NOT IMPLEMENTED)
- [x] Manager integration - accepts `Executor` interface via config
- [x] Tests use DryRun mode for scheduling/concurrency tests
### 3.7 Integration Test (End-to-End Scheduling) ✅
- [x] Create test robot in `__yao.member` with clock config
- [x] Start manager
- [x] Wait for clock trigger
- [x] Verify:
- [x] Robot loaded to cache
- [x] Clock trigger matched
- [x] Job submitted to pool
- [x] Worker picked up job
- [x] Executor stub called
- [x] Job execution recorded
- [x] Logs written
- [x] Test human intervention trigger
- [x] Test event trigger
- [x] Test concurrent executions (multiple robots)
- [x] Test quota enforcement (per-robot limit)
- [x] Test pause/resume/stop
**Test Files Created:**
- `manager/integration_test.go` - Core scheduling flow (Cache→Pool→Executor)
- `manager/integration_clock_test.go` - Clock trigger modes (times/interval/daemon)
- `manager/integration_human_test.go` - Human intervention trigger tests
- `manager/integration_event_test.go` - Event trigger tests
- `manager/integration_concurrent_test.go` - Concurrent execution & quota tests
- `manager/integration_control_test.go` - Pause/Resume/Stop tests
**Test Coverage:**
- 27 top-level test functions
- 80+ sub-tests covering all verification points
- 3x run stability verified
---
## Phase 4: Agent Call Infrastructure ✅
**Goal:** Implement unified Agent/Assistant calling mechanism. This is the foundation for all phase implementations (P0-P5).
**Architecture Note:**
- **Prompt construction is handled by Assistant layer** (`prompts.yml` in each assistant)
- **Executor only prepares input data** (ClockContext, InspirationReport, etc.) and calls Assistant
- **Assistant framework handles** prompt rendering, LLM API calls, streaming
**Implemented:**
1. A unified way to call assistants with streaming support
2. Input data formatting for each phase
3. Response parsing (markdown and structured data via `gou/text`)
4. Multi-turn conversation support
### 4.1 Agent Caller Implementation ✅
- [x] `executor/agent.go` - `AgentCaller` struct with `SkipOutput`, `SkipHistory`, `SkipSearch`, `ChatID`
- [x] `executor/agent.go` - `Call(ctx, assistantID, messages)` - basic call with full response
- [x] `executor/agent.go` - `CallWithMessages(ctx, assistantID, userContent)` - convenience method
- [x] `executor/agent.go` - `CallWithSystemAndUser(ctx, assistantID, systemContent, userContent)`
- [x] `executor/agent.go` - handle assistant not found error
- [x] `executor/agent.go` - handle LLM API errors gracefully
- [x] `executor/agent.go` - `CallResult.GetJSON()` / `GetJSONArray()` - parse JSON response using `gou/text`
- [x] `executor/agent.go` - `Conversation` struct for multi-turn dialogues
- [x] `executor/agent.go` - `Conversation.Turn()`, `RunUntil()`, `Reset()`, `WithSystemPrompt()`
- [x] `executor/agent.go` - Use `agentcontext.Noop()` logger to suppress debug output
### 4.2 Input Formatters ✅
- [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatClockContext(clockCtx, robot)` - format clock context as message content
- [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatInspirationReport(report)` - format P0 output for P1 input
- [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatTriggerInput(input)` - format Human/Event trigger for P1 input
- [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatGoals(goals, robot)` - format P1 output for P2 input
- [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatTasks(tasks)` - format P2 output for P3 input
- [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatTaskResults(results)` - format P3 output for P4/P5 input
- [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatExecutionSummary(exec)` - format full execution for P5 input
- [x] `executor/input.go` - `BuildMessages()`, `BuildMessagesWithSystem()` - helper methods
### 4.3 Test Assistants ✅
- [x] `yao-dev-app/assistants/tests/robot-single/` - Single-turn test assistant
- [x] `yao-dev-app/assistants/tests/robot-conversation/` - Multi-turn conversation test assistant
### 4.4 Tests ✅
- [x] `executor/agent_test.go` - 22 test cases for AgentCaller and Conversation
- [x] `executor/input_test.go` - 20 test cases for InputFormatter
- [x] Verify: assistant can be called and returns response
- [x] Verify: multi-turn conversation maintains state
- [x] Verify: input data is well-formatted for assistant prompts
- [x] Verify: JSON/YAML extraction from LLM output works correctly
---
## Phase 5: Test Scenario & Assistants Setup ✅
**Goal:** Create realistic test scenarios with all required assistants.
**Architecture:**
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 6 Generic Phase Agents (P0-P5) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ inspiration │ goals │ tasks │ validation │ delivery │ learning │
│ (P0) │ (P1) │ (P2) │ (P3) │ (P4) │ (P5) │
└───────────────┴─────────┴─────────┴──────────────┴────────────┴─────────────┘
↓ P2 assigns tasks to
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Expert Agents (Task Executors) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ text-writer │ web-reader │ data-analyst │ summarizer │ ... │
│ (Generate) │ (Fetch URL) │ (Analyze) │ (Summarize) │ │
└───────────────┴──────────────┴────────────────┴──────────────┴─────────────┘
```
**Test Strategy:**
- Phase Agents (P0-P5) are **generic** and reusable across all robot types
- Expert Agents are **specialized** for specific tasks (text, web, data, etc.)
- Each P0-P5 test uses **different expert combinations** to cover real scenarios
- Tests use `interval: 1s` or `TriggerManual()` for easy triggering (no time dependency)
### 5.1 Directory Structure
```
yao-dev-app/assistants/
├── robot/ # Generic Phase Agents
│ ├── inspiration/ # P0: Analyze clock context, generate insights
│ │ ├── package.yao
│ │ └── prompts.yml
│ ├── goals/ # P1: Generate prioritized goals
│ │ ├── package.yao
│ │ └── prompts.yml
│ ├── tasks/ # P2: Split goals into executable tasks
│ │ ├── package.yao
│ │ └── prompts.yml
│ ├── validation/ # P3: Validate task results
│ │ ├── package.yao
│ │ └── prompts.yml
│ ├── delivery/ # P4: Format and deliver results
│ │ ├── package.yao
│ │ └── prompts.yml
│ └── learning/ # P5: Summarize execution, extract insights
│ ├── package.yao
│ └── prompts.yml
└── experts/ # Expert Agents (Task Executors)
├── text-writer/ # Generate text content (reports, emails, summaries)
│ ├── package.yao
│ └── prompts.yml
├── web-reader/ # Fetch and parse web page content
│ ├── package.yao
│ └── prompts.yml
├── data-analyst/ # Analyze data, generate insights
│ ├── package.yao
│ └── prompts.yml
└── summarizer/ # Summarize long text into key points
├── package.yao
└── prompts.yml
```
### 5.2 Generic Phase Agents
#### 5.2.1 Inspiration Agent (P0)
- [x] `robot/inspiration/package.yao` - config with model, temperature
- [x] `robot/inspiration/prompts.yml` - system prompt:
- Input: Clock context (time, day, markers), robot identity
- Output: Markdown report with Summary, Highlights, Opportunities, Risks
- Style: Analytical, context-aware
#### 5.2.2 Goals Agent (P1)
- [x] `robot/goals/package.yao` - config
- [x] `robot/goals/prompts.yml` - system prompt:
- Input: Inspiration report OR trigger input (human/event)
- Output: Prioritized goals in markdown (High/Normal/Low)
- Style: Strategic, actionable
#### 5.2.3 Tasks Agent (P2)
- [x] `robot/tasks/package.yao` - config
- [x] `robot/tasks/prompts.yml` - system prompt:
- Input: Goals, available expert agents list
- Output: Structured task list (JSON) with executor assignments
- Style: Detailed, executable
#### 5.2.4 Validation Agent (P3)
- [x] `robot/validation/package.yao` - config
- [x] `robot/validation/prompts.yml` - system prompt:
- Input: Task result, expected outcome
- Output: Validation result (pass/fail, issues, suggestions)
- Style: Critical, thorough
#### 5.2.5 Delivery Agent (P4)
- [x] `robot/delivery/package.yao` - config
- [x] `robot/delivery/prompts.yml` - system prompt:
- Input: Full execution context (P0-P3 results)
- Output: Formatted delivery content
- Style: Clear, professional
#### 5.2.6 Learning Agent (P5)
- [x] `robot/learning/package.yao` - config
- [x] `robot/learning/prompts.yml` - system prompt:
- Input: Full execution summary
- Output: Insights, patterns, improvement suggestions
- Style: Reflective, insightful
### 5.3 Expert Agents (Task Executors)
#### 5.3.1 Text Writer
- [x] `experts/text-writer/package.yao` - config
- [x] `experts/text-writer/prompts.yml` - system prompt:
- Input: Topic, key points, style (formal/casual), length
- Output: Generated text content
- Use cases: Weekly reports, email drafts, summaries
#### 5.3.2 Web Reader
- [x] `experts/web-reader/package.yao` - config with hooks
- [x] `experts/web-reader/prompts.yml` - system prompt:
- Input: URL or topic to search
- Output: Extracted content, key information
- Use cases: News fetching, competitor monitoring, research
- [x] `experts/web-reader/src/fetch.ts` - HTTP fetching utilities
- [x] `experts/web-reader/src/fetch_test.ts` - 19 test cases (100% pass)
- [x] `experts/web-reader/src/index.ts` - Create/Next hooks
#### 5.3.3 Data Analyst
- [x] `experts/data-analyst/package.yao` - config
- [x] `experts/data-analyst/prompts.yml` - system prompt:
- Input: Data description, analysis goal
- Output: Analysis report, trends, insights
- Use cases: Sales analysis, performance review
#### 5.3.4 Summarizer
- [x] `experts/summarizer/package.yao` - config
- [x] `experts/summarizer/prompts.yml` - system prompt:
- Input: Long text content
- Output: Concise summary with key points
- Use cases: Document summarization, meeting notes
### 5.4 Test Scenarios
Each phase test uses different expert combinations:
| Test | Phase | Trigger | Expert Agents Used | Verification |
| ---- | ----- | ---------------- | ------------------------ | ----------------------------- |
| T1 | P0 | Clock (interval) | - | Clock → Inspiration report |
| T2 | P1 | Clock | - | Inspiration → Goals |
| T3 | P1 | Human | - | User input → Goals |
| T4 | P2 | Clock | text-writer, web-reader | Goals → Tasks with executors |
| T5 | P3 | Clock | text-writer | Task exec → Result validation |
| T6 | P3 | Human | summarizer | Task exec → Result validation |
| T7 | P4 | Clock | - | Results → Delivery format |
| T8 | P5 | Clock | - | Full execution → Insights |
| T9 | E2E | Clock | text-writer, summarizer | Full P0→P5 flow |
| T10 | E2E | Human | web-reader, data-analyst | Full P1→P5 flow |
### 5.5 Verification
- [x] All 6 Phase Agents load correctly (`robot.inspiration`, `robot.goals`, etc.)
- [x] All 4 Expert Agents load correctly (`experts.text-writer`, `experts.web-reader`, etc.)
- [x] Web Reader `fetch.ts` utilities tested (19 tests, 100% pass)
---
## Phase 6: P0 Inspiration Implementation ✅
**Goal:** Implement P0 (Inspiration Agent). Clock trigger → P0 → stub P1-P5.
**Depends on:** Phase 4 (Agent Call Infrastructure), Phase 5 (Assistants Setup)
**Status:** COMPLETED
### 6.1 P0 Implementation
- [x] `executor/inspiration.go` - `RunInspiration(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation
- [x] `executor/inspiration.go` - build prompt using `InputFormatter.FormatClockContext()`
- [x] `executor/inspiration.go` - call Inspiration Agent using `AgentCaller`
- [x] `executor/inspiration.go` - parse response to `InspirationReport` (markdown content)
- [x] `types/robot.go` - added `GetRobot()`/`SetRobot()` methods for Execution
- [x] `executor/executor.go` - set robot reference on execution creation
### 6.2 Tests
- [x] `executor/inspiration_test.go` - P0 with real LLM call (8 test cases)
- [x] Test: clock context correctly formatted in prompt
- [x] Test: robot identity included in prompt
- [x] Test: markdown report generated with expected sections
- [x] Test: handles LLM errors gracefully (robot nil, agent not found)
- [x] Test: uses clock from trigger input or creates new one
- [x] `InputFormatter.FormatClockContext()` unit tests (4 test cases)
### 6.3 Notes
- `executor_test.go` temporarily moved to `.bak` - will restore when all phases implemented
- P0 uses `robot.inspiration` test agent from `yao-dev-app/assistants/robot/inspiration/`
---
## Phase 7: P1 Goals Implementation ✅
**Goal:** Implement P1 (Goal Generation Agent). P0 → P1 → stub P2-P5.
**Depends on:** Phase 6 (P0 Inspiration)
**Status:** COMPLETED
### 7.1 P1 Implementation
- [x] `executor/goals.go` - `RunGoals(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation
- [x] `executor/goals.go` - build prompt with inspiration report (Clock trigger)
- [x] `executor/goals.go` - build prompt with trigger input (Human/Event trigger)
- [x] `executor/goals.go` - call Goals Agent using `AgentCaller`
- [x] `executor/goals.go` - parse response to `Goals` struct (JSON with content + delivery)
- [x] `executor/goals.go` - handle Human/Event trigger (skip P0, use input directly)
- [x] `executor/goals.go` - include robot identity in prompt
- [x] `executor/goals.go` - include available resources in prompt
- [x] `executor/goals.go` - `ParseDelivery()` - parse delivery target from JSON
- [x] `executor/goals.go` - `IsValidDeliveryType()` - validate delivery types
### 7.2 Tests
- [x] `executor/goals_test.go` - P1 with real LLM call (14 test cases)
- [x] Test: inspiration report in prompt (Clock trigger)
- [x] Test: user input in prompt (Human trigger)
- [x] Test: event data in prompt (Event trigger)
- [x] Test: goals markdown generated with priorities
- [x] Test: delivery parsing from agent response
- [x] Test: error handling (robot nil, agent not found, empty input)
- [x] Test: fallback behavior (no inspiration → clock context)
- [x] `ParseDelivery()` unit tests (8 test cases covering edge cases)
- [x] `IsValidDeliveryType()` unit tests
### 7.3 Notes
- P1 uses `robot.goals` test agent from `yao-dev-app/assistants/robot/goals/`
- Goals Agent returns JSON: `{ "content": "...", "delivery": {...} }`
- Delivery is optional; if not present or invalid, `Goals.Delivery` is nil
- Available resources (agents, MCP, KB, DB) are passed to agent for achievable goal generation
---
## Phase 8: P2 Tasks Implementation ✅
**Goal:** Implement P2 (Task Planning Agent). P1 → P2 → stub P3-P5.
**Depends on:** Phase 7 (P1 Goals)
**Status:** COMPLETED
### 8.1 Validation Agent Setup (Prerequisite for P3) ✅
> **Note:** Validation Agent was already set up in Phase 5.
- [x] `robot/validation/package.yao` - Validation Agent config (DeepSeek V3, temperature 0.2)
- [x] `robot/validation/prompts.yml` - validation prompts
- Input: Task result, expected outcome, validation rules
- Output: Validation result (pass/fail, score, issues, suggestions)
### 8.2 P2 Implementation ✅
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - `RunTasks(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - build prompt with goals (using `FormatGoals`)
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - include available tools/agents in prompt
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - include delivery target in prompt (for task output format)
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - call Tasks Agent using `AgentCaller`
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - parse response to `[]Task` (structured JSON)
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - validate task structure (executor type, ID, messages)
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - `ParseTasks()`, `ParseTask()`, `ParseMessages()` helpers
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - `SortTasksByOrder()` - ensure correct execution sequence
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - `ValidateExecutorExists()` - optional executor existence check
- [x] `executor/tasks.go` - `ValidateTasksWithResources()` - validation with warnings
- [x] `executor/input.go` - `FormatGoals()` updated to include Delivery Target
### 8.3 Tests ✅
- [x] `executor/tasks_test.go` - P2 with real LLM call (7 integration tests)
- [x] Test: goals included in prompt
- [x] Test: available tools listed in prompt
- [x] Test: delivery target included in prompt
- [x] Test: structured tasks generated
- [x] Test: each task has valid executor type and ID
- [x] Test: each task has expected output and validation rules
- [x] `ParseTasks` unit tests (5 tests)
- [x] `ValidateTasks` unit tests (5 tests)
- [x] `SortTasksByOrder` unit tests (4 tests)
- [x] `ValidateExecutorExists` unit tests (7 tests)
- [x] `ValidateTasksWithResources` unit tests (3 tests)
- [x] `ParseExecutorType` unit tests (5 tests)
- [x] `IsValidExecutorType` unit tests (2 tests)
- [x] `FormatGoals` with delivery target tests (4 tests)
### 8.4 Notes
- Tasks Agent returns JSON: `{ "tasks": [...] }`
- Each task includes: id, executor_type, executor_id, messages, expected_output, validation_rules, order
- Tasks are sorted by `order` field after parsing
- Executor existence is optionally validated (warnings only, doesn't block)
- Delivery target from P1 is passed to P2 so tasks can produce appropriate output format
---
## Phase 9: P3 Run Implementation ✅
**Goal:** Implement P3 (Task Execution + Validation). P2 → P3 → stub P4-P5.
**Depends on:** Phase 8 (P2 Tasks + Validation Agent)
**Status:** Complete
### 9.1 Implementation ✅
- [x] `executor/run.go` - `RunExecution(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation
- [x] `RunConfig` - configuration (ContinueOnFailure, ValidationThreshold, MaxTurnsPerTask)
- [x] Sequential task execution with progress tracking
- [x] Task status updates (Running → Completed/Failed/Skipped)
- [x] `ContinueOnFailure` option for graceful failure handling
- [x] Previous task results passed as context to subsequent tasks
- [x] `executor/runner.go` - `Runner` struct for task execution
- [x] `ExecuteWithRetry()` - multi-turn conversation flow for assistant tasks
- [x] `executeNonAssistantTask()` - single-call execution for MCP/Process
- [x] `executeAssistantWithMultiTurn()` - AI assistant with conversation support
- [x] `ExecuteMCPTask()` - MCP tool execution (format: `clientID.toolName`)
- [x] `ExecuteProcessTask()` - Yao process execution
- [x] `BuildTaskContext()` - context with previous results
- [x] `BuildAssistantMessages()` - build messages for assistant
- [x] `FormatPreviousResultsAsContext()` - format previous results as context
- [x] `extractOutput()` - extract output from CallResult
- [x] `generateDefaultReply()` - fallback reply generation
- [x] `executor/validator.go` - Two-layer validation system
- [x] Layer 1: Rule-based validation using `yao/assert`
- [x] Layer 2: Semantic validation using Validation Agent
- [x] `ValidateWithContext()` - validation with multi-turn support
- [x] `isComplete()` - determine if expected result is obtained
- [x] `checkNeedReply()` - determine if conversation should continue
- [x] `generateFeedbackReply()` - generate validation feedback for next turn
- [x] `detectNeedMoreInfo()` - detect if assistant needs clarification
- [x] `convertStringRule()` - natural language rules to assertions
- [x] `parseRules()` - JSON and string rule parsing
- [x] `mergeResults()` - combine rule and semantic results
### 9.2 Assert Package ✅
Created new `yao/assert` package for universal assertion/validation:
- [x] `assert/types.go` - `Assertion`, `Result`, `AssertionOptions` types
- [x] `assert/asserter.go` - `Asserter` with 8 assertion types:
- [x] `equals` - exact match
- [x] `contains` - substring check
- [x] `not_contains` - negative substring check
- [x] `json_path` - JSON path extraction and comparison
- [x] `regex` - regex pattern matching
- [x] `type` - type checking (with optional path)
- [x] `script` - custom script validation
- [x] `agent` - AI agent validation
- [x] `assert/helpers.go` - `ValidateOutput()`, `ExtractPath()`, `ToString()`, `GetType()`
- [x] `assert/asserter_test.go` - 98.7% test coverage
### 9.3 Tests
**Completed:**
- [x] `assert/asserter_test.go` - 40+ test cases (98.7% coverage)
- [x] `types/robot_test.go` - Task structure tests with validation rules
- [x] `tasks_test.go` - ParseTasks with validation rules format
- [x] Validation rules format aligned with `prompts.yml` guidelines
**Completed Tests:**
- [x] `executor/standard/run_test.go` - P3 RunExecution tests ✅
- [x] Test: tasks executed in order (`TestRunExecutionBasic`)
- [x] Test: task status updates (`TestRunExecutionTaskStatus`)
- [x] Test: remaining tasks marked as skipped on failure
- [x] Test: error handling (robot nil, no tasks, non-existent assistant)
- [x] Test: rule-based and semantic validation (`TestRunExecutionValidation`)
- [x] Test: previous results passed as context to subsequent tasks
- [x] `executor/standard/runner_test.go` - Runner tests ✅
- [x] Test: ExecuteWithRetry with multi-turn conversation flow
- [x] Test: max turns limit enforcement
- [x] Test: BuildTaskContext with previous results
- [x] Test: FormatPreviousResultsAsContext formatting
- [x] Test: BuildAssistantMessages with task content
- [x] Test: FormatMessagesAsText (string, multipart, map)
- [x] Test: MCP and Process tasks (skipped - requires runtime)
- [x] `executor/standard/validator_test.go` - Validator tests ✅
- [x] Test: ValidateWithContext with multi-turn state
- [x] Test: isComplete determination logic
- [x] Test: checkNeedReply scenarios
- [x] Test: convertStringRule for natural language rules
- [x] Test: parseRules for JSON assertions (equals, regex, json_path, type)
- [x] Test: validateSemantic with Validation Agent
- [x] Test: mergeResults logic (rule + semantic)
**Completed:**
- [x] Test: ContinueOnFailure option (run_test.go) ✅
- [x] `stops_on_first_failure_when_ContinueOnFailure_is_false`
- [x] `continues_execution_when_ContinueOnFailure_is_true`
- [x] `multiple_failures_with_ContinueOnFailure`
---
## Phase 10: P4 Delivery Implementation
**Goal:** Implement P4 (Delivery). P3 → P4 → stub P5.
**Depends on:** Phase 9 (P3 Run)
### 10.1 Execution Persistence (Prerequisite) ✅
> **Background:** Each Robot execution (P0-P5) needs persistent storage for UI history queries.
- [x] `yao/models/agent/execution.mod.yao` - Execution record model (`agent_execution` table)
- [x] id, execution_id (unique)
- [x] member_id (globally unique), team_id
- [x] trigger_type (enum: clock, human, event)
- [x] **Status tracking** (synced with runtime Execution):
- [x] status (enum: pending, running, completed, failed, cancelled)
- [x] phase (enum: inspiration, goals, tasks, run, delivery, learning)
- [x] current (JSON) - current executing state (task_index, progress)
- [x] error - error message if failed
- [x] input (JSON) - trigger input
- [x] **Phase outputs** (P0-P5):
- [x] inspiration (JSON) - P0 output
- [x] goals (JSON) - P1 output
- [x] tasks (JSON) - P2 output
- [x] results (JSON) - P3 output
- [x] delivery (JSON) - P4 output
- [x] learning (JSON) - P5 output
- [x] **Timestamps**: start_time, end_time, created_at, updated_at
- [x] Relations: member (hasOne __yao.member)
- [x] `agent/robot/store/execution.go` - Execution record storage
- [x] `Save(ctx, record)` - create or update execution record
- [x] `Get(ctx, execID)` - get execution by ID
- [x] `List(ctx, opts)` - query execution history with filters
- [x] `UpdatePhase(ctx, execID, phase, data)` - update current phase and data
- [x] `UpdateStatus(ctx, execID, status, error)` - update execution status
- [x] `UpdateCurrent(ctx, execID, current)` - update current executing state
- [x] `Delete(ctx, execID)` - delete execution record
- [x] `FromExecution(exec, robotID)` - convert runtime Execution to record
- [x] `ToExecution()` - convert record to runtime Execution
- [x] Tests: `agent/robot/store/execution_test.go` (9 test groups, all passing)
- [x] Integrate into Executor - call `UpdatePhase()` after each phase completes
- [x] Added `SkipPersistence` config option to `executor/types/Config`
- [x] Added `ExecutionStore` to `executor/standard/Executor`
- [x] Save execution record at start of `Execute()`
- [x] Call `UpdatePhase()` after each phase completes in `runPhase()`
- [x] Call `UpdateStatus()` on status changes (running, completed, failed)
### 10.2 Messenger Attachment Support ✅
> **Conclusion:** All email providers now support attachments.
**Implementation Status:**
| Provider | Attachment Support | Implementation |
|----------|-------------------|----------------|
| Twilio/SendGrid | ✅ Supported | `buildAttachments()` - base64 encoded |
| Mailgun | ✅ Supported | `sendEmailWithAttachments()` - multipart/form-data |
| SMTP (mailer) | ✅ Supported | `buildMessageWithAttachments()` - MIME multipart/mixed |
**Features Supported:**
- Regular attachments (Content-Disposition: attachment)
- Inline attachments (Content-Disposition: inline) with Content-ID for HTML embedding
- Multiple attachments per email
- Automatic content type detection
- Base64 encoding for SMTP (RFC 2045 compliant, 76-char line wrapping)
**Tests Added:**
- `messenger/providers/mailgun/mailgun_test.go`:
- `TestSend_EmailWithAttachments_MockServer`
- `TestSend_EmailWithInlineAttachment_MockServer`
- `TestSend_EmailWithAttachments_RealAPI`
- `messenger/providers/mailer/mailer_test.go`:
- `TestBuildMessage_WithAttachments` (single, multiple, inline, no attachments)
- `TestSend_EmailWithAttachments_RealAPI`
```go
// messenger/types/types.go
type Attachment struct {
Filename string `json:"filename"`
ContentType string `json:"content_type"`
Content []byte `json:"content"`
Inline bool `json:"inline,omitempty"`
CID string `json:"cid,omitempty"`
}
```
Supported channels:
- [x] Email - Full attachment support
- [x] SMS - No attachment (text only)
- [x] WhatsApp - TBD
### 10.3 Type Updates (Prerequisite) ✅
- [x] Update `types/enums.go` - Update `DeliveryType` enum
- [x] Remove `DeliveryFile`
- [x] Add `DeliveryProcess`
- [x] Update `types/robot.go` - Delivery types for new architecture
- [x] `DeliveryResult` - update to new structure (RequestID, Content, Results[])
- [x] Add `DeliveryContent` struct
- [x] Add `DeliveryAttachment` struct
- [x] Add `DeliveryRequest` struct
- [x] Add `DeliveryContext` struct
- [x] Add `DeliveryPreferences` struct (with Email, Webhook, Process)
- [x] Add `EmailPreference`, `EmailTarget` structs
- [x] Add `WebhookPreference`, `WebhookTarget` structs
- [x] Add `ProcessPreference`, `ProcessTarget` structs
- [x] Add `ChannelResult` struct (with Target field)
- [x] Update `types/enums_test.go` - Update DeliveryType tests
- [x] Update `types/robot_test.go` - Update delivery result tests
### 10.4 Delivery Agent Setup
- [x] `robot/delivery/package.yao` - Delivery Agent config
- [x] `robot/delivery/prompts.yml` - delivery prompts
- [x] Input: Full execution context (P0-P3 results)
- [x] Output: DeliveryContent (Summary, Body, Attachments) - **only content, no channels**
- [x] Agent focuses on content generation, NOT channel selection
### 10.5 Delivery Content Structure
```go
// DeliveryRequest - pushed to Delivery Center
// No Channels - Delivery Center decides based on preferences
type DeliveryRequest struct {
Content *DeliveryContent `json:"content"` // Agent-generated content
Context *DeliveryContext `json:"context"` // Tracking info
}
// DeliveryContent - Content generated by Delivery Agent (only content)
type DeliveryContent struct {
Summary string `json:"summary"` // Brief 1-2 sentence summary
Body string `json:"body"` // Full markdown report
Attachments []DeliveryAttachment `json:"attachments,omitempty"` // Output artifacts from P3
}
// DeliveryAttachment - Task output attachment with metadata
type DeliveryAttachment struct {
Title string `json:"title"` // Human-readable title
Description string `json:"description,omitempty"` // What this artifact is
TaskID string `json:"task_id,omitempty"` // Which task produced this
File string `json:"file"` // Wrapper: __<uploader>://<fileID>
}
// DeliveryContext - tracking info
type DeliveryContext struct {
MemberID string `json:"member_id"` // Robot member ID (globally unique)
ExecutionID string `json:"execution_id"`
TriggerType TriggerType `json:"trigger_type"` // clock | human | event
TeamID string `json:"team_id"`
}
```
**Key Design:**
- **Agent only generates content** (Summary, Body, Attachments)
- **Delivery Center decides channels** based on Robot/User preferences
- If webhook configured, every execution pushes automatically
**File Wrapper:**
- Format: `__<uploader>://<fileID>`
- Parse: `attachment.Parse(value)``(uploader, fileID, isWrapper)`
- Read: `attachment.Base64(ctx, value)` → base64 content
**Delivery Channels (each supports multiple targets):**
| Channel | Description | Multiple Targets |
|---------|-------------|------------------|
| `email` | Send via yao/messenger | ✅ Multiple recipients |
| `webhook` | POST to external URL | ✅ Multiple URLs |
| `process` | Yao Process call | ✅ Multiple processes |
| `notify` | In-app notification | Future (auto by subscriptions) |
### 10.6 Implementation
**P4 Entry (executor/delivery.go):**
- [x] `RunDelivery(ctx, exec, data)` - P4 entry point
- [x] Call Delivery Agent to generate content (only content, no channels)
- [x] Build DeliveryRequest (Content + Context)
- [x] Push to Delivery Center
- [x] Store DeliveryResult in exec.Delivery
**Delivery Center (executor/delivery_center.go):**
- [x] `DeliveryCenter.Deliver(ctx, request)` - main entry
- [x] Read Robot/User delivery preferences
- [x] Iterate through all enabled targets for each channel
- [x] Aggregate ChannelResults into DeliveryResult
**Channel Handlers (each supports multiple targets):**
- [x] `sendEmail()` - uses yao/messenger
- [x] Convert DeliveryAttachment to messenger.Attachment
- [x] Support multiple EmailTarget
- [x] Support custom subject_template per target
- [x] Use `Robot.RobotEmail` as From address (if configured)
- [x] Use global `DefaultEmailChannel()` for messenger channel selection
- [x] `postWebhook()` - POST JSON
- [x] POST DeliveryContent as JSON payload
- [x] Support multiple WebhookTarget
- [x] Support custom headers per target
- [x] `callProcess()` - Yao Process call
- [x] DeliveryContent as first arg
- [x] Support multiple ProcessTarget
- [x] Support additional args per target
### 10.7 Tests
- [x] `executor/delivery_test.go` - P4 delivery
- [x] Test: Delivery Agent generates content (only content)
- [x] Test: DeliveryCenter reads preferences
- [x] Test: Multiple email targets (TestDeliveryCenterEmail)
- [x] Test: Multiple webhook targets
- [x] Test: Multiple process targets (TestDeliveryCenterProcess)
- [x] Test: Mixed channels (email + webhook + process) (TestDeliveryCenterAllChannels)
- [x] Test: sendEmail with attachments (TestDeliveryCenterEmail)
- [x] Test: postWebhook with custom headers
- [x] Test: callProcess with args (TestDeliveryCenterProcess)
- [x] Test: Partial success (some targets fail)
- [x] Test: DeliveryResult aggregation
---
## Phase 11: API & Integration (MVP)
**Goal:** Complete Go API and end-to-end tests. Main flow: P0 → P1 → P2 → P3 → P4.
**Depends on:** Phase 10 (P4 Delivery)
> **Note:** Process handlers and JSAPI are optional wrappers, moved to Phase 12.
> Go API is sufficient for MVP integration.
### 11.1 Go API Implementation
- [x] `api/types.go` - API request/response types
- [x] `api/lifecycle.go` - manager lifecycle
- [x] `Start()` / `Stop()` - manager lifecycle
- [x] `StartWithConfig(config)` - start with custom config
- [x] `IsRunning()` - check if system is running
- [x] `api/robot.go` - robot query functions
- [x] `GetRobot(memberID)` - get robot by member ID
- [x] `ListRobots(query)` - list robots with filtering
- [x] `GetRobotStatus(memberID)` - get robot runtime status
- [x] `api/trigger.go` - trigger functions
- [x] `Trigger(memberID, request)` - main trigger entry point
- [x] `TriggerManual(memberID, triggerType, data)` - manual trigger for testing
- [x] `Intervene(memberID, request)` - human intervention
- [x] `HandleEvent(memberID, request)` - event trigger
- [x] `api/execution.go` - execution query and control
- [x] `GetExecution(execID)` - get execution by ID
- [x] `ListExecutions(memberID, query)` - list executions
- [x] `GetExecutionStatus(execID)` - get execution with runtime status
- [x] `PauseExecution(execID)` / `ResumeExecution(execID)` / `StopExecution(execID)`
- [x] `api/api.go` - package documentation
- [x] Tests: `api/*_test.go` (black-box tests, 16 test cases)
### 11.2 End-to-End Tests
- [x] Full clock trigger flow (P0 → P1 → P2 → P3 → P4) - `e2e_clock_test.go`
- [x] Human intervention flow (P1 → P2 → P3 → P4) - `e2e_human_test.go`
- [x] Event trigger flow (P1 → P2 → P3 → P4) - `e2e_event_test.go`
- [x] Concurrent execution test - `e2e_concurrent_test.go`
- [x] Pause/Resume/Stop test - `e2e_control_test.go`
---
## Phase 12: OpenAPI Integration
**Goal:** HTTP endpoints for Robot Agent management and triggers.
**Depends on:** Phase 11 (API & Integration), Frontend UI Design
> **Note:** This phase will be planned in detail after frontend UI design is complete.
> The API endpoints will be designed based on actual UI requirements.
### 12.1 Planned Features
- [ ] HTTP endpoints for robot management (CRUD)
- [ ] HTTP endpoints for human intervention triggers
- [ ] Webhook endpoints for external events
- [ ] WebSocket for real-time execution status updates
- [ ] Authentication and authorization integration
### 12.2 Design Dependencies
- Frontend dashboard design (robot list, status, controls)
- Execution history UI design
- Human intervention UI design
- Real-time notification requirements
---
## Phase 13: Advanced Features
**Goal:** P5 Learning, Process/JSAPI wrappers, dedup, plan queue.
> **Note:** These are optional features. Main flow works without them.
### 13.1 Process & JSAPI Wrappers
> **Note:** These are convenience wrappers around Go API for Yao ecosystem integration.
- [ ] `api/process.go` - implement Process handlers
- [ ] `robot.Start` / `robot.Stop`
- [ ] `robot.Trigger` / `robot.Intervene` / `robot.HandleEvent`
- [ ] `robot.Pause` / `robot.Resume` / `robot.Stop`
- [ ] `robot.Get` / `robot.List`
- [ ] `robot.GetExecution` / `robot.ListExecutions`
- [ ] `api/jsapi.go` - implement JSAPI for JavaScript runtime
- [ ] Tests for Process and JSAPI
### 13.2 P5 Learning Implementation
> **Background:** P5 Learning is async, runs after P4 Delivery completes.
> User doesn't wait for it. Results stored in private KB for future reference.
#### 13.2.1 Learning Agent Setup
- [ ] `robot/learning/package.yao` - Learning Agent config
- [ ] `robot/learning/prompts.yml` - learning prompts
#### 13.2.2 Store Implementation
- [ ] `store/store.go` - Store interface and struct
- [ ] `store/kb.go` - KB operations (create, save, search)
- [ ] `store/learning.go` - save learning entries to private KB
#### 13.2.3 Implementation
- [ ] `executor/learning.go` - `RunLearning(ctx, exec, data)` - real implementation
- [ ] `executor/learning.go` - extract learnings from execution
- [ ] `executor/learning.go` - call Learning Agent
- [ ] `executor/learning.go` - save to private KB
#### 13.2.4 Tests
- [ ] `executor/learning_test.go` - P5 learning
- [ ] Test: learnings extracted from execution
- [ ] Test: learnings saved to KB
- [ ] Test: KB can be queried for past learnings
### 13.3 Fast Dedup (Time-Window)
> **Note:** Manager has `// TODO: dedup check` comment placeholder. Integrate after implementation.
- [ ] `dedup/dedup.go` - Dedup struct
- [ ] `dedup/fast.go` - fast in-memory time-window dedup
- [ ] Key: `memberID:triggerType:window`
- [ ] Check before submit
- [ ] Mark after submit
- [ ] Integrate into Manager.Tick()
- [ ] Test: dedup check/mark, window expiry
### 13.4 Semantic Dedup
- [ ] `dedup/semantic.go` - call Dedup Agent for goal/task level dedup
- [ ] Dedup Agent setup (`assistants/robot/dedup/`)
- [ ] Test: semantic dedup with real LLM
### 13.5 Plan Queue
- [ ] `plan/plan.go` - plan queue implementation
- [ ] Store planned tasks/goals
- [ ] Execute at next cycle or specified time
- [ ] `plan/schedule.go` - schedule for later
- [ ] Test: plan queue operations
> **Note:** Monitoring is provided by Job system (Activity Monitor UI). No separate implementation needed.
---
## Test Assistants Structure
```
yao-dev-app/assistants/robot/
├── inspiration/ # P0: Inspiration Agent
│ ├── package.yao
│ └── prompts.yml
├── goals/ # P1: Goal Generation Agent
│ ├── package.yao
│ └── prompts.yml
├── tasks/ # P2: Task Planning Agent
│ ├── package.yao
│ └── prompts.yml
├── validation/ # P3: Validation Agent
│ ├── package.yao
│ └── prompts.yml
├── delivery/ # P4: Delivery Agent
│ ├── package.yao
│ └── prompts.yml
├── learning/ # P5: Learning Agent
│ ├── package.yao
│ └── prompts.yml
└── dedup/ # Deduplication Agent
├── package.yao
└── prompts.yml
```
---
## Notes
### Test Environment Setup
1. **Environment Variables:** Run `source yao/env.local.sh` before tests
2. **Test Preparation:** Use `testutils.Prepare(t)` to load config, KB, and agents
```go
package robot_test
import (
"testing"
"github.com/yaoapp/yao/agent/testutils"
)
func TestExample(t *testing.T) {
// Load environment config (from YAO_TEST_APPLICATION)
// This loads: config, connectors, KB, agents, models, etc.
testutils.Prepare(t)
defer testutils.Clean(t)
// Your test code here
}
```
### Test Conventions
1. **Black-box Tests:** All tests in `*_test` package (external package)
2. **Real LLM Calls:** Use `gpt-4o` or `deepseek` connectors for agent tests
3. **Incremental:** Each phase builds on previous, all tests must pass before next phase
4. **No Skip:** Do NOT use `t.Skip()` except for `testing.Short()` (CI mode)
5. **Must Assert:** Every test MUST have result validation assertions
```go
func TestWithLLM(t *testing.T) {
// Only allowed Skip: testing.Short() for CI
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("Skipping integration test")
}
testutils.Prepare(t)
defer testutils.Clean(t)
// Your test code...
result, err := SomeFunction()
// MUST have assertions - no empty tests!
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.NotNil(t, result)
assert.Equal(t, expected, result.Field)
}
```
### Test Rules
| Rule | Description |
| ----------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
| No arbitrary Skip | Only `testing.Short()` skip allowed |
| Must assert | Every test must validate results |
| No empty tests | Tests without assertions will fail review |
| Real calls | LLM tests use real API calls, not mocks |
### Key Environment Variables
| Variable | Description |
| ---------------------- | ------------------------------- |
| `YAO_TEST_APPLICATION` | Test app path (`yao-dev-app`) |
| `OPENAI_TEST_KEY` | OpenAI API key |
| `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` | DeepSeek API key |
| `YAO_DB_DRIVER` | Database driver (mysql/sqlite3) |
| `YAO_DB_PRIMARY` | Database connection string |
---
## Progress Tracking
| Phase | Status | Description |
| --------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 1. Types & Interfaces | ✅ | All types, enums, interfaces |
| 2. Skeleton | ✅ | Empty stubs, code compiles |
| 3. Scheduling System | ✅ | Cache + Pool + Trigger + Job + Executor architecture |
| 4. Agent Infra | ✅ | AgentCaller, InputFormatter, test assistants |
| 5. Test Scenarios | ✅ | Phase agents (P0-P5), expert agents |
| 6. P0 Inspiration | ✅ | Inspiration Agent integration |
| 7. P1 Goals | ✅ | Goal Generation Agent integration |
| 8. P2 Tasks | ✅ | Task Planning Agent integration |
| 9. P3 Run | ✅ | Task execution + validation + yao/assert + multi-turn conversation |
| 10. P4 Delivery | ✅ | Output delivery (email/webhook/process, notify future) |
| 11. API & Integration | ✅ | Go API, end-to-end tests (main flow: P0→P1→P2→P3→P4) |
| 12. OpenAPI | ⬜ | HTTP endpoints (depends on frontend UI design) |
| 13. Advanced | ⬜ | Process/JSAPI, P5 Learning, dedup, plan queue, Sandbox |
Legend: ⬜ Not started | 🟡 In progress | ✅ Complete
**Main Flow (MVP):** P0 Inspiration → P1 Goals → P2 Tasks → P3 Run → P4 Delivery ✅
**OpenAPI (Phase 12):** HTTP endpoints - planned after frontend UI design
**Advanced (Phase 13):** P5 Learning (async), Process/JSAPI, Dedup, Plan Queue, Sandbox
---
## Quick Commands
```bash
# Setup environment
source yao/env.local.sh
# Run all robot tests
go test -v ./agent/robot/...
# Run specific phase tests
go test -v ./agent/robot/types/...
go test -v ./agent/robot/cache/...
go test -v ./agent/robot/pool/...
go test -v ./agent/robot/executor/...
# Run with coverage
go test -cover ./agent/robot/...
```